Monday, February 16, 2015
Never Again??
Op-Ed: Holocaust 2? More Horrifying than the Original.
Obama should personally drive Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to Congress.
Published: Sunday, February 15, 2015 5:04 PM
Never again? It's Again! We are so smart and prepared. If we should ever see before us Nazis and concentration camps then we will jump to action and make sure it doesn't happen. After all, we learned our lessons from history and now we will never allow such an event, era or episode to occur again.The after-the-fact excuse that Obama is not even going to meet with him because Israel is having an election, goes directly to the aortic heart valve relationship of the United States of America and Israel. The other countries in that region and elsewhere don't have elections. Obama can go to the Saudi king's funeral, there is no election there. Obama can rekindle relations with Cuba, there is no election there. Obama can negotiate with the Supreme Ruler Ayatollah of Iran, they don't have elections there.
While we have our eyes wide open to catch any glimpse of iron crosses and the first sighting of an upper lip, cropped, dark mustache, we are blind to the very true real fact that the Holocaust is here once more. And this one's not going to be as recoverable as the last one.
Obama can go to the Saudi king's funeral, there is no election there. Obama can rekindle relations with Cuba, there is no election there.The iconic six million number calculating the amount of Jews killed, in Holocaust No. 1, is hauntingly the same census of Jews living in the Jewish homeland of Israel right now. The last genocide required great trial and error, innovation and time in order for the Nazis to figure out how to gather, kill and dispose of the Jews.
This time the Jews are gathered in one spot, six million. Iran drops a nuclear bomb while the world watches. The possibility exists that Spielberg-esqe talents will then make movies about it again, museums will memorialize, memorials will erect facilities, artists and writers will produce Nobel works and the American Jews will scream, "Never again, again!"
That aftermath is just a supposition because sticks and stones will break my bones but nuclear weaponry is forever. Islamic caliphate, extremist, radical, murderous terrorists with atomic weapons, dirty bombs and long range missiles along with a short sighted Washington rewrite a Holocaust disaster movie for the U.S. to star in as well.
In short, there will be no Western World to write about it or build the museums; it will be a global disaster, one big crematorium.
And if you don't believe this scenario then you're the guy in the old Holocaust movie that was naked and walking into the gas chamber saying, "I hope the shower is warm."
So when the Prime Minister of Israel is invited by one of the branches of the U.S. Government (there are three, there is no king) and he wants to once again plead for a non-nuclear Iran, everyone should listen to him.
The U.S. President Barack Obama should personally drive him over to Congress.
And to Vice President Joe Biden who already announced that he will not attend Bibi's speech due to some phantom overseas trip to nowhere, Joe should cancel or postpone it because Hitler has the A-Bomb!
Netanyahu should accept every invite to speak about the Holocaust 2 threat, whether it comes from the White House janitor, Monica Lewinsky, Al Sharpton, David Letterman or even the Joint Houses of the United States Congress.
The Middle East is radicalized; Europe is done; Japan is beheaded; South America is corrupted; where should Israel's Prime Minister talk?
In the Holocaust 2 Museum, there will be an entire wing devoted to Obama and Biden and this moment in history when they negotiated with the nuclear Nazis in Tehran and didn't want a Jew to even talk in Washington.
Never again? Starting when?
Wednesday, February 11, 2015
Ex-Muslim Imam Pens Open Letter, Giving Obama A History Lesson About Islam
President Barack Obama sparked outrage when he compared medieval Christian wars to modern-day Islamic terrorism at the National Prayer Breakfast Thursday. He spouted that terrorist groups like ISIS “professed to stand up for Islam, but, in fact, are betraying it,” chastising the opposition from getting on “our high horse” when “people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ” during the Crusades and Spanish Inquisition.
Dr. Mark Christian, founder of Global Faith Institute, knows Islamic history too well, being an apostate from the Muslim faith himself. Having experienced the true nature of Islam firsthand as a devout Imam, Dr. Christian penned a fiery open letter to the American leader, which he graciously provided to Mad World News, that includes a blunt history lesson in the unchanging goal of ancient Islam:
President Obama… I realize you thought you were brave and courageous when you defamed Christianity by equating the Crusades and the Inquisition with the present-day barbarism of Islam, but I wonder if your “courage” goes so far as to blame Muslims for the Islamic conquests? Do you have the guts to tell them that in the name of Allah, they invaded nations, practiced ethnic and cultural cleansing, going so far as to erase the very history of conquered lands. Can you tell them that they changed languages and names, enslaved millions and killed an unknowable number of innocent souls simply because they worshiped God, and not “Allah?”. I think not. You know Christians will bow their heads and pray for you whereas Muslims will simply take your head and celebrate.Dr. Christian’s anger is righteous and warranted, and if elected leaders in the U.S. do not heed his word, America will become another conquest of an Islamic Caliphate revived.
ISIS is not animated by the usual “reaction to oppression” narrative the Left trots out as an excuse for every instance of horrible behavior, whether that behavior is rioting in Ferguson, Missouri or the systematic slaughter of all those opposed to your ideology.
ISIS is animated entirely by Islam. The manner in which they kill – prescribed and outlined in the Koran. The way they make war – prescribed and outlined in the Koran. The way they treat prisoners – also prescribed and outlined in the Koran.
ISIS does nothing that Mohammed didn’t first do 14 centuries ago.
You see, the problem isn’t a “radical interpretation of Islam,” the problem is the belief in Islam that Mohammed was the “perfect man,” and as such, worthy of emulation in all things.
Until Islam can recognize that their “perfect man” wasn’t perfect, and both did and ordered horrible things to be done – certainly things that have no place in a modern world – then there will always be an ISIS. There will always be those who dedicate their lives to imitating the man who spawned the greatest killing machine in known history…Islam.
Mike Konrad, the pen name of a colleague at American Thinker, has done the math for us in a remarkably cogent piece that deserved far more attention than it received when first published in early 2014.
The President drew a moral equivalence argument at this year’s National Prayer Breakfast between the predation of Islam and the actions of Christians during the Crusades and the Inquisition. The President is not uneducated. He is surely aware of the speciousness of that argument, yet still proffered it as a back-handed justification of the profane brutality of ISIS and other Islamic supremacist groups.
When we think of genocide, the names that spring to mind are Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot. Of course Mao and his utopian fantasies deserve a place alongside the other luminaries of human devastation; millions suffered and died because of these men.
But, when one looks a bit deeper we discover that when it comes to dealing death, the aforementioned dictators are mere peddlers compared to Islam. People forget that the Islamic conquests began 400 years before the Crusades, which were largely a response to Islamic aggression.
Beginning in the year 1000 and lasting for another 500 years, Islam attempted to depopulate India. They did a remarkably good job of it, as the overall population of the Indian subcontinent (despite very high birthrates) dropped by an estimated 80 million in that period.![]()
Don’t forget that Islam has always been a leader in the trafficking of humans – from the slave trade to present-day prostitution – Muslims have excelled in the sale of their fellows.
Just under 30 million slaves from Africa were held in the Middle East and considering the death rate of slaves in transport (an estimated 80%!) Arab Muslim traders would’ve needed more than a 100 million to have provided the number of slaves we know survived.
While Christianity is forever maligned for forced conversions and bad behavior in Africa, in truth, Muslims performed these atrocities on a scale many orders of magnitude greater, and continued to do so for more than a thousand years.
Of course, we shan’t forget the Islamic slaughter in Sudan, the methodical murder and sexual slavery ongoing in Nigeria or the genocide of 1.5 million Armenians by Muslim Turks at the turn of the 20th century.
When Mohammed began his spread of Islam, most of North Africa and all of Europe was Christian. Where are they now? According to the Catholic Education Resource Center, there are no remaining communities of Christians that can trace their roots back to antiquity. Over the span of centuries, this number adds up to millions more dead, at the hands of Islam.
According to Mr. Konrad,
“Possibly one-third to one-half or more of all those killed by war or slavery in history can be traced to Islam.”
The totals boggle the mind. By a conservative estimate, Islam is directly responsible for a quarter of a BILLION dead. Indirectly, hundreds of millions more.
To quote Mr. Konrad,
“Unlike the 20th-century totalitarians whose killing fury consumed themselves, reducing their longevity, Islam paces itself. In the end, though slower, Islam has killed and tortured far more than any other creed – religious or secular. Unlike secular tyranny, Islam, by virtue of its polygamy and sexual predation, reproduces itself and increases.”
Other tyrannies are furious infections, which burn hot, but are soon overcome. Islam is a slow terminal cancer, which metastasizes, and takes over. It never retreats. Its methods are more insidious, often imperceptible at first, driven by demographics. Like cancer, excision may be the only cure.
Mohammed is the “perfect man” of Islam, and as such is the role model for every Muslim. Looking at the horrors perpetrated by Mohammed, it becomes crystal clear that the more devout the Muslim, the more depraved and regressive their behavior.
There is no justification, no moral equivalence to be drawn between the behavior of Christians a thousand years ago, and the behavior of Muslims today. The more salient point is that while the predation of Christianity died away, the worst of Islamic practices are on the rise.
So Mr. President, please focus your attention toward a real problem – Islamic supremacism – the rest of us have the Crusades and the Inquisition under control.
Because of Muhammad’s example, Muslims have justifiably wiped out 270 million non-Muslims in their endeavors to establish the world Islamic government their prophet viciously commands.
ISIS is more than an Ottoman army reborn; it is the last attempt at bringing about the apocalyptic rule written in the Quran, which, like all communistic regimes, comes at the price of millions of innocent lives. In fact, it’s as if ISIS’s every decision is made by carefully consulting the Quran and Hadith beforehand, cautiously avoiding straying from the path of Islam. Never before has Islam been so successful in jihad than to force Western nations to bow to Sharia law, and that has been and is the goal of Islam’s political ideology since the time of Muhammad. If the greatest Christian nation on earth cannot even call it by name, there is little chance of preventing it from infiltrating our homeland.
Saturday, February 7, 2015
Moving
I have to move house. I calculate this will take me a minimum of a month. Please check back with this blog around the 7th of March.
To Fight Jihad or Not to Fight
Stories about King Abdullah were all over the internet the last two days. His majesty did not, it appears, lead the bombing of Isis in retaliation for burning a downed Jordanian pilot alive, but he did send the bombers, execute Isis prisoners and take some clear action against the grisly Middle East bullies.
People respect courage, no matter what their religion is.
In stark contrast some of the papers also carried shivering little articles of concern about how Isis would react to the Jordanian audacity of actually standing up to them. Judging from the Kurdish approach it can work pretty darn well....at least a whole lot better than appeasing people who enjoy decapitation and human barbecues.
There is no such thing as a diplomatic solution to jihad. You either fight them with all your might or they get you.
Wake up O Zion!!!!
People respect courage, no matter what their religion is.
In stark contrast some of the papers also carried shivering little articles of concern about how Isis would react to the Jordanian audacity of actually standing up to them. Judging from the Kurdish approach it can work pretty darn well....at least a whole lot better than appeasing people who enjoy decapitation and human barbecues.
There is no such thing as a diplomatic solution to jihad. You either fight them with all your might or they get you.
Wake up O Zion!!!!
Jordan’s King Abdullah Did Not Personally Fly Airstrikes On ISIS
The former fighter pilot monarch remains kind of a badass, though.
posted on Feb. 6, 2015, at 5:46 a.m.
Claudia Koerner
BuzzFeed News Reporter
Jordan’s King Abdullah announced he was cutting short a visit to the U.S. following the brutal death of a Jordanian pilot burned to death by Isis.
Sometimes called the “Warrior King,” it wasn’t long before rumors began spreading that his majesty was going to take care of business — personally.
The images spread on social media…
…and prompted some meme-based political commentary.
It made a great story, but it wasn’t true, the Jordanian government said. Airstrikes did hit targets in Syria, but the king was not in the pilot’s seat.
A bomb
with Koranic verses is pictured on a Royal Jordanian Air Force plane at
an air base before its launch to strike the Islamic state in the Syrian
city of Raqqa on Thursday. Petra / Reuters
Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh told
CNN Thursday the rumors of the king personally launching airstrikes on
ISIS targets were “creative,” but untrue.
Actually, the king was involved in some more conventional leadership. He met with officials and security leaders.
The cockpit image appears to be from an October charity event, when he piloted a helicopter for children with cancer.
Saturday, January 24, 2015
January 18, 2015
'What are you doing to my Jews?'
That
was the querulous question Winston Churchill barked at Colonial
Secretary George Lloyd in the depths of World War II. It would be hard
to imagine any other statesman asking such a question, speaking so
paternally of the Jewish people. But weighed down with the burdens of
fighting Hitler and the Japanese, Churchill nonetheless took time to
bitterly accost his own cabinet member and upbraid him for trying to
block immigration of desperate Jews into Palestine, then a British
Mandate.
We certainly cannot imagine even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asking such a question. Netanyahu recently flew, uninvited and not entirely welcome, to Paris. There, he exchanged brief frosty words with France’s Socialist president, François Hollande. They met outside the Grand Synagogue. Netanyahu was surely aware that even before the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo’s editorial offices and the kosher market, France’s climate of anti-Semitism had led 7,000 Jews to make Aliyah and seek refuge in Israel.
Had Netayahu confronted Hollande, asking Churchill’s famous question, Hollande might have replied: “We give French Jews the same protections we give every Frenchman. We forbid them to carry weapons and if they are attacked by a military-style SWAT team of terrorists, we send in unarmed policemen on bicycles.”
We certainly cannot imagine a U.S. statesman like Henry Kissinger asking such a question of the Soviet Communist bosses in the 1970s. They were oppressing the Jews of the USSR, but Kissinger loudly opposed the Jackson-Vanik Amendment that tied U.S.-Soviet trade to the Kremlin’s willingness to let persecuted Russian Jews escape to Israel.
Kissinger apparently never heard of Benjamin Disraeli’s dictum -- a watchword that Churchill repeated regularly: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.”
We know what President Obama thinks of Benjamin Netanyahu. When then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy complained to our chief that he could not stand the Israeli prime minister, Obama sympathized, saying: “I have to deal with him every day.”
And how does our president deal with Israel every day? If French Jews and Ukrainian Jews leave their beloved home countries because of anti-Semitism, they flood into Israel, the haven of the Jewish people. There, they build apartments in East Jerusalem and settle into towns in Judea and Samaria, on the West Bank of the Jordan. These are historically Jewish areas.
But President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, former Secretary Hillary Clinton, and current placeholder John Kerry have all denounced the Jewish settlements in Israel. They demand that Israel give up more territory to the PLO, those inventors of airline hijacking for terror purposes. In return for yielding more territory to their sworn enemies, the Israelis are going to get peace, or so the Obama administration assures us.
Just like they got peace for evacuating Gaza, for leaving South Lebanon, and for yielding up control of Bethlehem and Jericho. What they got is thousands of rockets launched against them and a constant drumbeat of incitement of young Arabs to kill all Jews.
President Obama presides over the most anti-Israel administration in U.S. history. While blocking sanctions against nuclear-chasing Iranian mullahs, his administration even toyed with sanctions against Israel. Only a bipartisan howl of outrage on Capitol Hill stayed Mr. Obama’s hand. (“I have to deal with him every day!”)
We suggest Mr. Obama emulate his model in Peace Prizing diplomacy, Jimmy Carter. We suggest he take some time to go up on the mountain at Camp David. But he should not bring his entire cabinet and then decide to fire the lot of them, as the flummoxed Carter did.
Instead, we respectfully suggest the president go by himself to Camp David to reflect and pray. He might consider his own place in history. He might contemplate Disraeli’s wise words: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.”
And -- who knows? -- he just might hear that still small voice asking him: “What are you doing to my Jews?”
We certainly cannot imagine even Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu asking such a question. Netanyahu recently flew, uninvited and not entirely welcome, to Paris. There, he exchanged brief frosty words with France’s Socialist president, François Hollande. They met outside the Grand Synagogue. Netanyahu was surely aware that even before the terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo’s editorial offices and the kosher market, France’s climate of anti-Semitism had led 7,000 Jews to make Aliyah and seek refuge in Israel.
Had Netayahu confronted Hollande, asking Churchill’s famous question, Hollande might have replied: “We give French Jews the same protections we give every Frenchman. We forbid them to carry weapons and if they are attacked by a military-style SWAT team of terrorists, we send in unarmed policemen on bicycles.”
We certainly cannot imagine a U.S. statesman like Henry Kissinger asking such a question of the Soviet Communist bosses in the 1970s. They were oppressing the Jews of the USSR, but Kissinger loudly opposed the Jackson-Vanik Amendment that tied U.S.-Soviet trade to the Kremlin’s willingness to let persecuted Russian Jews escape to Israel.
Kissinger apparently never heard of Benjamin Disraeli’s dictum -- a watchword that Churchill repeated regularly: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.”
We know what President Obama thinks of Benjamin Netanyahu. When then-French president Nicolas Sarkozy complained to our chief that he could not stand the Israeli prime minister, Obama sympathized, saying: “I have to deal with him every day.”
And how does our president deal with Israel every day? If French Jews and Ukrainian Jews leave their beloved home countries because of anti-Semitism, they flood into Israel, the haven of the Jewish people. There, they build apartments in East Jerusalem and settle into towns in Judea and Samaria, on the West Bank of the Jordan. These are historically Jewish areas.
But President Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, former Secretary Hillary Clinton, and current placeholder John Kerry have all denounced the Jewish settlements in Israel. They demand that Israel give up more territory to the PLO, those inventors of airline hijacking for terror purposes. In return for yielding more territory to their sworn enemies, the Israelis are going to get peace, or so the Obama administration assures us.
Just like they got peace for evacuating Gaza, for leaving South Lebanon, and for yielding up control of Bethlehem and Jericho. What they got is thousands of rockets launched against them and a constant drumbeat of incitement of young Arabs to kill all Jews.
President Obama presides over the most anti-Israel administration in U.S. history. While blocking sanctions against nuclear-chasing Iranian mullahs, his administration even toyed with sanctions against Israel. Only a bipartisan howl of outrage on Capitol Hill stayed Mr. Obama’s hand. (“I have to deal with him every day!”)
We suggest Mr. Obama emulate his model in Peace Prizing diplomacy, Jimmy Carter. We suggest he take some time to go up on the mountain at Camp David. But he should not bring his entire cabinet and then decide to fire the lot of them, as the flummoxed Carter did.
Instead, we respectfully suggest the president go by himself to Camp David to reflect and pray. He might consider his own place in history. He might contemplate Disraeli’s wise words: “The Lord deals with the nations as the nations deal with the Jews.”
And -- who knows? -- he just might hear that still small voice asking him: “What are you doing to my Jews?”
Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/01/what_are_you_doing_to_my_jews.html#ixzz3PlmUPyfh
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook
Monday, January 19, 2015
Wrong is Wrong
If God says something is wrong it is wrong. He said multiple times in His word that it is wrong for his chosen people, the Israelites, to mistreat strangers in their land.
It is astonishing and sickening to read the comments to articles like the one I posted below. There is a popular wave of hatred being nurtured against these refugees by Israelis. Without even bothering to deny that what they are doing is wrong, most of the comments simply dehumanize these people and justify the cruelty Any defender of these poor humans is immediately shouted down as, "Leftist, anti Israel etc."
Satan must be sitting back and roaring with laughter.....because the God of Israel will judge His chosen people for this, and judge them harshly.
This is wrong. I don't care how you idiots justify it, your God doesn't agree.
(For the record, the Eritreans and Sudanese are refugees.)
It is astonishing and sickening to read the comments to articles like the one I posted below. There is a popular wave of hatred being nurtured against these refugees by Israelis. Without even bothering to deny that what they are doing is wrong, most of the comments simply dehumanize these people and justify the cruelty Any defender of these poor humans is immediately shouted down as, "Leftist, anti Israel etc."
Satan must be sitting back and roaring with laughter.....because the God of Israel will judge His chosen people for this, and judge them harshly.
This is wrong. I don't care how you idiots justify it, your God doesn't agree.
(For the record, the Eritreans and Sudanese are refugees.)
ref·u·gee
noun \ˌre-fyu̇-ˈjē, ˈre-fyu̇-ˌ\
: someone who has been forced to leave a country because of war or for religious or political reasons
For Israel’s migrants, a hell frozen over
The open detention center at Holot houses more than 2,000 African migrants; to activists and residents, it’s a blight on the country’s democracy
The view on the road from Tel
Aviv to the Holot Open Detention center turns to sand very quickly.
Hills of beige and gold, dotted with black stubble and slanting acacia
trees, roll by each side of Route 211, which snakes southwest from
Beersheba and cuts a course toward Israel’s border with the Sinai
desert.
At
the end of that road, in what feels like the most middle-of-nowhere
place in the small country, Mutasim Ali waits for his friends.
Ali, 28, is one of the most famous faces at
Holot, the so-called “open prison” built in 2011 as an alternative
solution to the Saharonim Prison, where thousands of African asylum
seekers have been held after crossing illegally into Israel on foot. Ali
himself did his time in Saharonim, staying at that facility for one
month in 2010 after fleeing his war-torn home of Darfur, Sudan and
arriving in Israel.
And like so many of the 2,200 Sudanese and
Eritrean men who now live at Holot, Ali was quickly released from
Saharonim, given a bus ticket to south Tel Aviv, and left alone to start
a life here in Israel.
Mutasim
Ali stands in front of an electrical box at Holot, on which detainees
have scrawled, “UN We Need Freedom.” (photo credit: Debra Kamin/Times of
Israel)
For several years, as both Sudan and Eritrea
choked on their own blood and African migrants began trekking on foot
toward Israel from the Horn of Africa and the Nile Valley, this was the
government’s unofficial policy: Let the migrants enter, detain them
briefly, and then bus them to Tel Aviv or Beersheva with a temporary
visa that required four renewals a year and forbade them to work or go
to school.
Ali received his summons eight months ago, and now lives here, amid the spiky shrubbery and the floating piles of trash and the spires of barbed wire that jut against the desert sky.
In South Tel Aviv, though, Ali learned Hebrew.
He polished his already-impressive English. He began working with the
African Refugee Development Center, a Tel Aviv nonprofit that helps
African refugees in Israel, and soon he became the organization’s
director.
In 2013, however, Israel began re-detaining
many of its thousands of African migrants, citing a new
anti-infiltration law, which has undergone four additional amendments in
the past two years. One after another, as migrants who had settled in
Israel went to the Ministry of Interior to renew their three-month
residency permits, they found themselves slapped with a summons to
report to Holot. Ali received his summons eight months ago, and now
lives here, amid the spiky shrubbery and the floating piles of trash and
the spires of barbed wire that jut against the desert sky.
Holot is a so-called open facility, meaning
its residents are free to leave after 6 a.m. each day, but must be back
and signed in at the facility by 10 p.m. each night. But to the hundreds
of residents – all of them African men over the age of 18, the vast
majority with asylum petitions that have gone ignored by the Israeli
government – the open gates are nothing but a red herring.
Elliot
Glassenberg, far left, stands with refugees and activists at the
entrance to Holot, Saturday, Jan. 17, 2015. (photo credit: Debra
Kamin/Times of Israel)
They are so far out in the middle of nowhere,
they say, that they can’t ever really leave and get back in time for
curfew. There is no medical care here, they say. No education, either.
They can’t bring in produce or dairy from the outside, but the food,
they say, is both sparse and inedible. Many men complain of food
poisoning.
And at night in these winter months, they add,
the temperature sometimes hovers near freezing. (After a series of
reports earlier this month that residents were having their private
space heaters confiscated, the Israeli government ruled that every room
in Holot would be outfitted with a heater/air conditioning unit in the
next seven days).
Ali agrees that the food is often inedible,
that promises of education and teachers have never been fulfilled, and
that the facility’s one doctor is ill-equipped to handle the medical
cases of 2,200 migrant men. But he is not surprised by any of it, he
says.
“There is one reason that they do all of this
to us,” he says. “They want to make it very difficult here [in Israel],
so that people will want to return [to Africa].”
Zacki Mohammed Abdullah, 26, tells his story about living at Holot. (photo credit: Debra Kamin/Times of Israel)
There are currently about 47,000 African
migrants living in Israel, the vast majority of whom claim to be asylum
seekers. More than 90 percent of them come from Eritrea, Sudan and the
Congo, but Israel has recognized fewer than 1 percent of asylum claims,
and since 2009, less than 0.15 percent — the lowest rate in the Western
world.
“There is one reason that they do all of this to us. They want to make it very difficult here, so that people will want to return.”
International law embraces a non-refoulment
policy, which forbids expelling people who have fled war or genocide
back to the country that they came from. Ali and his fellow migrants, as
well as the busload of volunteers and activists who visited them on
Saturday, believe that Israel is trying instead to make the migrants
miserable enough to want to go home by their own free will.
Detractors say that crime and vandalism has skyrocketed in south Tel Aviv
as the area has been flooded with migrants. They point out that the
vast majority of Africans pleading for asylum are men between 18 and 35
years of age – the exact profile of economic migrants, not political
ones. The UNHCR has said that the traffic of Africans toward Israel is a
mixed migration, meaning it is stemming from both economic motives and
the need to flee political oppression.
To the activists who work in south Tel Aviv
and make regular visits to Holot, however, those claims are irrelevant.
Nothing, they say, justifies herding several thousand men into a
penitentiary without a trial or accusation of a crime.
“Holot should not exist. Holot should be
closed. People should not be put in incarceration without trial, in a
democratic country, or in any country,” says Elliott Glassenberg, one of
the activists who organized Saturday’s solidarity ride down to the
facility. “People who have suffered trauma, who came to this country and
have requested asylum, should not, by a moral or legal standpoint, be
incarcerated.”
When we pull up at Holot, around noon, it is
sunny but cool. The migrants who greet us are in coats and hats, and
several have scarves pulled up around their faces. Three hours later,
however, with several hours of daylight still ahead of us, the wind
turns sharply cold. It’s clear that winter nights in this place are
decidedly bitter.
Nearly all of the migrants tell the same story
– death and genocide turning their homelands to smoke, decisions of
either staying and dying or fleeing and risking their fate, and a
journey of many, many miles by foot. Most arrived in Egypt and soon
realized that that nation’s government, which is allied with Sudan, was
never going to welcome them. So they continued walking, and after three
days, came to the border with Israel, where the military welcomed them
and promised them safety.
“We chose to cross to Israel because Israel is
a democratic country. We thought, they will protect us and give us
rights,” says Zacki Mohammed Abdullah, a burly 26-year-old whose
starched white shirt is blindingly bright against his inky skin.
For Glassenberg, Israel should, as the Jewish
state, be leading the world in its treatment of those who seek asylum
within in its borders.
Two detainees at Holot, Adil and Tashome, tell their stories. (photo credit: Debra Kamin/Times of Israel)
“You shall love the stranger, because you were
strangers in the land of Egypt,” he says, quoting Exodus. “To me this
is the essence of what it means to be a Jew. To know what it’s like to
be oppressed and to fight against marginalization and oppression
anywhere.”
“We chose to cross to Israel because Israel is a democratic country. We thought, they will protect us and give us rights.”
In late 2014, the Supreme Court ruled that
Holot was violating basic human rights laws and would be closed by
December 26. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Interior Ministry
then scrambled to make Israel’s anti-infiltration law, overturning the
closure ruling by passing an amendment that allows for illegal
immigrants to be detained for 20 months with no trial.
Holot, for the time being, remains open.
“We are not the enemy. We open our hearts to
the Israeli people. We want to make ourselves and our lives better,”
Abdullah says. “No one wants to be a refugee, but this life picked us.”
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
